\def\xorder#1{x_{\left(#1\right)}}
\def\xset{\mathbb{X}}
\def\xvec{\mathbf{x}}
A somewhat odd (to me) question was asked on a forum recently. Assume
that you have continuous variables x_{1},\dots,x_{N} that are subject
to some constraints. For simplicity, I'll just write \xvec=(x_{1},\dots,x_{N})\in\xset.
I'm going to assume that \xset is compact, and so in particular
the x_{i} are bounded. The questioner wanted to know how to model
the problem of minimizing the median of the values x_{1},\dots,x_{N}.
I don't know why that was the goal, but the formulation is mildly
interesting and fairly straightforward, with one wrinkle.
The wrinkle has to do with whether N is odd or even. Suppose that
we sort the components of some solution \xvec, resulting in what
is sometimes called the "order statistic": \xorder 1\le\xorder 2\le\dots\xorder N.
For odd N, the median is \xorder{\frac{N+1}{2}}.For even N,
it is usually defined as \left(\xorder{\frac{N}{2}}+\xorder{\frac{N}{2}+1}\right)/2.
The odd case is easier, so we'll start there. Introduce N new binary
variables z_{1},\dots,z_{N} and a new continuous variable y,
which represents the median x value. The objective will be to minimize
y. In addition to the constraint \xvec\in\xset, we use "big-M"
constraints to force y to be at least as large as half the sample
(rounding "half" up). Those constraints are:
\begin{align*}
y & \ge x_{i}-M_{i}z_{i},\ i=1,\dots,N\\
\sum_{i=1}^{N}z_{i} & =\frac{N-1}{2}
\end{align*}
with the M_{i} sufficiently large positive constants. The last
constraint forces z_{i}=0 for exactly \frac{N+1}{2} of the indices
i, which in turn forces y\ge x_{i} for \frac{N+1}{2} of the
x_{i}. Since the objective minimizes y, z_{i} will be 0 for
the \frac{N+1}{2} smallest of the x_{i} and y will be no
larger than the smallest of them. In other words, we are guaranteed
that in the optimal solution y=\xorder{\frac{N+1}{2}}, i.e., it
is the median of the optimal \xvec.
If N is even and if we are going to use the standard definition
of median, we need twice as many added variables (or at least that's
the formulation that comes to mind). In addition to the z_{i},
let w_{1},\dots,w_{N} also be binary variables, and replace y
with a pair of continuous variables y_{1}, y_{2}. The objective
becomes minimization of their average (y_{1}+y_{2})/2 subject to
the constraints
\begin{align*}
y_{1} & \ge x_{i}-M_{i}z_{i}\ \forall i\\
y_{2} & \ge x_{i}-M_{i}w_{i}\ \forall i\\
\sum_{i=1}^{N}z_{i} & =\frac{N}{2}-1\\
\sum_{i=1}^{N}w_{i} & =\frac{N}{2}
\end{align*}
where the M_{i} are as before. The constraints force y_{1} to
be at least as large as \frac{N}{2}+1 of the x_{i} and y_{2}
to be at least as large as \frac{N}{2} of them. The minimum objective
value will occur when y_{1}=\xorder{\frac{N}{2}+1} and y_{2}=\xorder{\frac{N}{2}}.